Executive Order 24-04 Toolkit
In This Section
Executive Order 24-04 encourages state agencies to focus on skills and abilities instead of rigid degree or experience requirements, making it easier for more people to qualify for positions. It also emphasizes training to help reduce bias in hiring and ensure that all employees have the tools they need to work with an equity-focused mindset. Key actions include streamlining recruitment through an accessible online system, removing unnecessary qualifications that may unfairly limit opportunities, ensuring pay equity, and regularly reporting progress on these efforts. Overall, the goal is to build a workforce that reflects the diversity of the community, with tangible progress shared each year to ensure the state stays on track.
Future releases will include equity competencies, pay equity plan guidance and reporting process, OLRS demographic data reporting process, and the statewide equity competency assessment.
EO 24-04 does not technically apply to higher education institutions, but we do encourage higher ed institutions to take steps to meet the intent of the EO in your organization. SHB 2216 regarding college degree requirements does apply to higher ed, so institutions of higher education will want to consult with their Assistant Attorney General for any questions regarding that legislation.
Our intention is to provide guidance and support that is helpful for agencies to implement this EO. As we release guidance and information, we want to know if it is meeting that mark, and if not, we want to hear from you what additional information and support would be helpful. Some of the future support under consideration include additional training resources, guidance to help determine whether or not qualifications such as English proficiency, driver’s licenses, lifting 50 lbs., etc. are essential to a position, support for applicants with this change, and ways agencies can share information and promising practices with one another.
Additionally, as we’ve had to adjust deadlines to ensure we deliver quality products to you, please keep us informed if you encounter any difficulties or need extra time or support while implementing this EO.
We are all working toward these goals together in an effort to increase employment opportunities throughout the enterprise, and we will all do the best we can within the resources we have. As long as we are making progress toward that goal, we are meeting the intent of the EO.
Please send all questions and feedback regarding EO 24-04 to statehr@ofm.wa.gov.
Anti-bias training and objectives
In accordance with Executive Order 24-04, Increasing Employment Opportunities in Washington State Government, the Department of Enterprise Services now offers both initial and refresher trainings on being aware of and mitigating bias when hiring for state jobs. Beginning March 1, all employees who participate in recruiting and hiring new employees must take the antibias training each year. DES offers the training courses described below. Agencies may develop their own trainings, but they must be approved by DES Equity and Employee Development.
Additional classes are posted on the DES website as they become available.
Resources
Communication and organization change management plan
The goal
The goal is to provide a customizable template for state agencies. This plan is designed to support a smooth transition to new, more equitable hiring practices. The plan ensures all individuals feel informed, involved, and confident as the agency adopts skills-based hiring. The plan focuses on clear communication and creating an environment where everyone understands the changes, feels heard, and can actively engage with the new approach, while giving agencies the flexibility to tailor the plan to their specific needs.
Competency-based hiring
Achieving equity and diversity within our workforce requires a comprehensive approach to recruitment and hiring that identifies and eliminates barriers to employment and institutional discrimination.
SHB 2216 requires agencies to remove degrees as the only way to meet a required qualification (unless the degree is required by law to perform the essential functions of the job). How else can we assess candidates? Agencies must look at experience through alternate ways. Agencies must either offer at least one other alternative way to meet that qualification or list competency-based requirements.
By focusing on skills, competency-based selection can ensure that people of all ages and backgrounds receive consideration, regardless of the length of their formal experience or other factors. To achieve diversity in hiring, start by appointing diverse panels. It’s important to have people on interview panels who don’t all look and think the same.
A “competency” is simply the ability to do something successfully or efficiently. In assessing competencies in the communications area, for example, an organization might evaluate a candidate’s proficiency at “asking questions effectively, confronting conflict, telling stories, paraphrasing, and presenting ideas with clarity.”
- Create a panel of top performers. Input from top performers is an effective way to define competencies. Top performers know their job inside out and excel at it. They can tell you what it takes to do a great job.
- Focus hiring managers on the task. Get hiring managers to understand the critical competencies needed for the position. For example, a customer service employee may need empathy in certain situations, such as dealing with a customer needing services.
- Reduce the scope to a manageable level. Narrow down the competencies to be evaluated. Less is more. Be focused. There is never a need for more than eight competencies. Keep it simple. Competencies should always be very straightforward and easily understood.
- Develop competency-based interview questions. Questions should be open-ended to help identify behavioral attributes. A common way to create questions is by providing examples of how a competency might be exhibited. For example, if you are trying to determine if someone was ‘action-oriented,’ you might ask, “Tell me about a time when you had to work on a project or task that you were dreading. How did you get started?”
- Conduct a competency-based interview. Competency-based questions ask candidates to navigate hypothetical scenarios and explain or demonstrate what they would do in certain circumstances. For example, ask a social worker candidate to “pose questions for a hypothetical case.” This gives the interviewer a real-life way of judging somebody’s competency to interview and gather information.
Competency-based hiring resources
Sample competency resources
These resources were created from a few of the more common job classifications used at many agencies. The competencies are unique to a position/job description (not to all jobs within that classification). They include essential job functions, the competencies needed to perform the essential job functions, and examples of how the competencies are applied in the role. Additionally, alternative ways a candidate could qualify for the job (without a degree) and sample interview questions are included.
Resources
There have been several questions about how EO 24-04 will impact our current classification structure. The short answer is it will take time to determine this. In our initial look at the enterprise-wide class specifications, we only found a few classification specifications where a college degree was a requirement and these were addressed. A college degree was most often found in the desired qualifications, and there is no decision at this time regarding removing the desired qualifications section. However, we will be taking a closer look at the class specifications to ensure alignment with EO 24-04 and this will take some time. We were planning to have a thorough review of the class structure this year, but that project has been put on hold due to budget constraints. We can confirm, however, that using years of experience to qualify candidates for progressive class series is acceptable per the executive order as there is an established standard for it by OFM State HR.
Eliminate degree requirements as the only way to qualify for jobs
SHB 2216 requires agencies to remove degrees as the only way to meet a required qualification (unless the degree is required by law to perform the essential functions of the job).
Revisiting qualification standards is not about lowering the bar; it’s about making sure the bar accurately measures what’s needed for the job. It values what someone can do over the degrees or credentials they hold. By matching job needs with real-word skills and experiences, we can reduce unintentional biases against certain groups.
Focusing on skills provides a more inclusive way to assess potential. This approach can help even the playing field, especially in higher-paying roles where higher education is often mandatory. A combination of skills, knowledge, and experience might be suitable equivalencies to a specific degree and help lessens the gap between groups who haven’t traditionally had the same access to education. Agencies must look at job requirements differently. We have provided some examples below.
Examples of job requirements for job postings
Equity competency guidelines
Through Executive Order 24-04, Washington State government adopted a competency-based recruitment and hiring system for executive and small cabinet agencies who report to the governor. We are committed to two things: (1) creating a recruitment and hiring process that allows people to more fairly compete for jobs and, (2) achieving excellent customer service by improving Washington state employees’ ability to serve all people who need services. We are currently in the process of implementing this executive order.
Thus far, agencies have been directed to remove college degrees as the only way to meet a required qualification (unless the degree is required by law) and implement competency-based qualifications that focus on the knowledge, skills, and abilities necessary to do the essential work of a position.
Required equity competencies
Recruitment and hiring
Ensuring every state employee is hired with the ability to serve the people and communities of our state equitably requires that agencies embed these required equity competencies throughout their recruitment and hiring documents and processes to effectively assess a candidate’s mindset toward equity.
The following are sample equity competency questions for the cover letter, application, interview, and reference processes. Agencies may choose to use and/or adapt these questions to fit the processes unique to their agency or to a specific position. They may also use their own questions and are encouraged to partner with their agency’s equity leader when doing so.
Agencies are responsible for understanding and assessing the risk associated with their recruitment and hiring practices.
Note: With ChatGPT and other AI technology, it’s necessary to ensure that candidates respond with their own answers rather than using a technologically generated response. You may want to add the following language to your questions: “In your own words (not AI generated), [insert question].”
Achieving equity and diversity within state agencies requires a comprehensive approach to recruitment and hiring that identifies and eliminates barriers to employment and institutional discrimination. We understand that processes create burdens for some in our community and limit access for others.
Appropriate assessment, categorization, and movement of individuals through the OLRS steps is crucial. This includes compliance with certification and referral of qualified candidates in accordance with the Washington Administrative Code and collective bargaining contracts. Consistent and reliable data will help identify areas for improvement and remove barriers to state government employment, ultimately improving workforce planning strategies. Including
- Reliable data for strategic workforce planning and recruitment initiatives.
- Enterprise-wide recruitment processes that are efficient, effective, and accountable.
The Six Required Steps
There are six required steps within the OLRS. The steps are defined and outlined below. They are purposely vague; we do not want to tell agencies how to manage their recruitment process. Once an individual applies, their application should be moved through the steps in accordance with definitions, laws, and policies. Recruiters can add extra steps but at a minimum must use these six steps.
It is important to move individuals through the system in real time. As we prepare for the implementation of Workday, it is imperative that hires within the OLRS be recorded timely to ensure the transfer of individuals to the onboarding process within Workday. Please also note that actions taken to move individuals are time stamped in the OLRS. This is a key component in a legally defensible hire.
Each of the steps below includes a definition, a reference to the Washington Administration Code, the OLRS reference, and the data points of interest that will answer the question: Where are diverse individuals falling out of the recruitment process?
Conclusion
By following these guidelines and ensuring individuals are moved through each step of the recruitment process, recruiters will provide consistent and reliable data. This data is crucial for identifying areas for improvement, removing barriers to employment, and improving workforce planning strategies across state agencies
Resources
Pay equity lens guidance
Purpose:
To move towards equal pay for equal work “pay equity” regardless of gender, race, ability, religion, educational attainment, etc. as identified in Executive Order 24-04, Increasing Employment Opportunities in Washington State Government.
Intent:
This guidance is intended to assist agency leaders and HR professionals in determining the appropriate salary to offer/hire job candidates and ensure pay equity across their teams. It can also be used when assessing pay equity across the organization including pay for similar positions in different business units. This guidance should be used in conjunction with the organization’s approved salary determination or administration policies.
Similar positions are those in the same or a different job classification that have different primary/essential functions but a similar scope, area of responsibility, scope and impact. The level of supervision and lead/supervisory responsibility assigned are also similar. In addition, working conditions, such as the physical surroundings, hazards encountered, and the time of day when the work is performed should be considered. HR professionals are responsible for analyzing and comparing position descriptions to evaluate these factors.
Criteria:
In determining the initial base salary within the assigned salary range or band of the position, leaders along with HR, should consider all combinations of experience and higher education relevant to the position, including lived, volunteer (paid or unpaid) or professional, that demonstrate the knowledge, skills, and abilities (competency) necessary to perform the work. This includes:
- Totality of experience; evaluating both quantity (how much for how long) and quality (depth, complexity, etc.).
- Value of higher education (degrees, certifications, etc.); evaluating the requirement (by law or job classification) and relevance.
- Level of competency/expertise they will bring; prioritizing experience and higher education directly related to the primary/essential functions.
Leaders and HR professionals should also consider:
- Current labor market.
- Internal Alignment: comparing against the salary of existing employees in the same or similar positions to prevent inequities or salary compression/inversion issues.
- Budget Constraints: ensuring salary decisions align with the agency’s budget constraints but avoid disproportionately underpaying based on external pressures.
Note: As a result of the Equal Pay & Opportunities Act, at no time should you inquire about the candidates current or past salary.
Other recommendations:
- Ensure accurate position descriptions; update as needed to reflect the role, responsibilities and requirements of each position
- Conduct ongoing training; ensure leaders and HR professionals receive training that informs equitable salary setting practices
- Define discretion and document decisions; reduce risk with clear, transparent, and consistent decision making and
- Establish objective criteria for negotiating salaries; create guidelines to ensure consistency and avoid pay disparities
- While EO 24-04 does not apply to institutions of higher education and related boards, they should reference RCW 41.06.133(1) (j) which requires salary ranges at institutions of higher education and related boards to be competitive for positions of a similar nature in the state or the locality in which an institution of higher education or related board is located. Such adoption and revision is subject to approval in accordance with RCW 43.88.